RealGM

Ooooh, so this is what the score should look like when the refs don't give the Hawks 50 fts a game. Call the game even, and we win by 30. Gotcha.

Good lookin' out, refs.

I'm going to say one more thing on this subject and then put it to rest:

I 100% agree.

Come now Gonzo, no need to be a sore winner!

But while I'm here: Too true!

Please, ATL got at LEAST as many bad calls as Boston did. The fact that y'all have complained about that is just annoying, stop. We were screwed by the refs probably MORE.

I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.

^^^^^^ Reffing sucks the entire league throughout. You are 100% right about that. We're just poking fun at that fact (and at the conspiracy theorists on this board), that's all.

It was a hell of a series, regardless of the refs!

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.

When the facts don't support your argument, resort to your "thoughts." Are you from Kansas?

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.

I can see how you say that when the Hawks had like a +70 free throw advantage over the Celtics; common sense just tells you that.

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.

Wait, you are not a Celtics or Hawks fans and you watched the 7 games of this particular series?

I thought so.

Celtics just didn't foul as much. Stop with this ref bull.

Bleeding Green: Nice sig!

SuperDeluxe wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wait, you are not a Celtics or Hawks fans and you watched the 7 games of this particular series?

I thought so.

I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.

sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.

Ignoring the fact that the ref who got "pushed" didn't even call a foul on Garnett for the alleged infraction nor did any of the other refs. But keep telling yourself Stern saved the Celts. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

sh00n wrote:I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.

Well, that's your opinion. Considering you have trolled this board before, I won't give a crap about it.

sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.

And I bet you believe in Tooth Fairies, too.

NBA...where a troll thinks that having a -70 in FT discrepancy is an advantage happens.

Just imagine how many calls LBJ is gonna get, Pierce is gonna foul out every game

For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.

dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.

RealGM...Where nonsense happens.

dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.

Gonzo is a Celts fan. When he says "call a game even and we win by 30" he means the Celts win by 30.

GonzoLays wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I can see how you say that when the Hawks had like a +70 free throw advantage over the Celtics; common sense just tells you that.

But of course!