firedavidkahn wrote:Why on Earth would Milwaukee want to give up on Dame already?
Why wouldn’t they? They need depth and young legs.
Moderators: Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake
firedavidkahn wrote:Why on Earth would Milwaukee want to give up on Dame already?
Frank Dux wrote:firedavidkahn wrote:Why on Earth would Milwaukee want to give up on Dame already?
Why wouldn’t they? They need depth and young legs.
LaLover11 wrote:zero rings wrote:LaLover11 wrote:
Please reply with a non trash trade for Lillard the bucks can get
They’re not trading Lillard.
I guess just like your username
Lillard will finish his career with the Bucks with
"Zero Rings"
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
LaLover11 wrote:Frank Dux wrote:firedavidkahn wrote:Why on Earth would Milwaukee want to give up on Dame already?
Why wouldn’t they? They need depth and young legs.
Exactly
KGtabake wrote:LaLover11 wrote:Frank Dux wrote:
Why wouldn’t they? They need depth and young legs.
Exactly
Okey...but why would they do it for the Lakers offer?
If anything, they have him on contract until 2027.
They have all the leverage in the world.
They can demand a younger star player, a couple of decent fillers for depth plus 2-3 first round picks.
I don't see any of the above in your offer.
NyKnicks1714 wrote:The Bucks would want a significantly higher price for Dame than what any team is going to offer. No one's trying to pay him $170 million over the next three years. Milwaukee is getting to the point where they're wasting Giannis's prime and I don't know what they can do about it. Middleton is on a reasonable deal and will have some interest, but don't think Milwaukee can get enough for him to contend.
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
LaLover11 wrote:tcheco wrote:ChipotleWest wrote:
Bro you're playing NBA 2K with some of these trade ideas. That's a garbage package for Milwaukee to give up Dame. They probably want to see what happens with him and Giannis healthy.
Watch out, WentzerWuver will show up and say you make love to Lillard if you think that's not good value.
Bucks would be up vs the Pacers right now if they had those players right now vs Lillard all by himself & now especially injured.
If you deny that we can agree you're just lying
DusterBuster wrote:iLLmatic860 wrote:Who would they even trade for him
Plenty of teams, the real question is why the Bucks would take that stupid offer.
jefe wrote:How exactly would they go about doing that? This hypothetical sounds nearly as plausible as "If the Lakers trade for prime Olajuwon" next season...
BlazersBroncos wrote:These Dame offers are about as realistic as Jessica Biel stalking me.
LaLover11 wrote:How good would a Lakers team that trades for Lillard perform next season?
He could become their Jamal Murray and help score in the playoffs & clutch situations
They obviously become better than this season and can keep Lillard & AD together when LeBron retires
LeBron Quote: "Give me Damian Lillard, I'll show you how appreciated he'll be"
2024 #17 pick