thinktank wrote:Should we make a Denver vs Celtics Final series thread?
People need a space.
Yeah I think a lot of these conversations are wayyyy premature.
Moderators: infinite11285, Domejandro, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake
thinktank wrote:Should we make a Denver vs Celtics Final series thread?
People need a space.
CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
Jaqua92 wrote:Triple7 wrote:SFour wrote:
they don't....who's going to stop Jokic on their team
Lol tf you guys are talking about. They barely beat the Lakers. They are just in a groove right now. Both times we played, the games went to the last minute, with Tatum shooting poorly. I admit, the Nuggets would be favored, and would be hard to beat, but we just need to shoot lights out for 4 games. Its not like the nuggets are that great defensively.
The nuggets are a top 10 defensive team. And when they barely beat LA this season in the playoffs, they shot like 30% from three for the series and Murray was still injured.
The second game the Celtics played against them had Denver shooting like 20% from 3. The first game everyone in Denver shot like crap outside of Murray and Jokic. I remember, I was there.
I don't know if the Celtics don't stand a chance, but I think it's extremely likely that the Timberwolves failing to capitalize on their 2-0 series lead cost the Celtics the championship.
Mrakar wrote:CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
Wolves already did all of that, but the Nuggets countered. Wolves had Gobert roaming around, and Nuggets forced him into plays by making Gordon a playmaker. If they switch Jokic has Gobert on him and its BBQ chicken...
KAT has done a good job on Jokic except that he is fouling for no reason and then has to go out of the game.
Jaqua92 wrote:thinktank wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:
Regular season is irrelevant. Wolves looked like the better team than Denver in the regular season during all of their matchups.
Celtics are being disrespected. They were historically good, and if OKC, Mavs, OR Minnesota came out of the West, Celtics win handily. We've seen Minnesota struggle against a more competent defense now.
Boston has the #2 defense in the NBA. Minnesota will struggle. Boston has 4 different guys who they can throw at Ant.
Boston wins in 5, or 6. Stop disrespecting them just because they're Boston.
They lose to Denver in the finals in 6 though. Timberwolves blew the Celtic's chances this year.
You want it both ways.
“RS doesn’t matter. Boston was historically good.”
Make up your mind.
If this Boston core wins a chip, THEN you can start the chip guarantees. Not before.
You can’t guarantee something you’ve never done.
Regular season matchups don't matter..but the entirety of the season, especially a historical one, is indicative of a legit championship squad.
I also said I think they lose to Senver.
nomansland wrote:thinktank wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:
Jesus Christ. There's not some conspiracy against the Wolves here.
The media was extremely quick to annoint Ant would so clearly rather see them in the finals. Hell, even the Minnesota board was talking about this. But as soon as Denver turned it around, the narrative changed. Games 1-2, you guys were world beaters, no one in the league can hang unless the league interferes. Now, trailing, it's rigged against you?
Man, get real. Denver is a better team.
I never said Denver wasn’t the better team. I said the NBA wants 7 games. I ask for better reading comprehension. Thanks.
Sure, the NBA wants 7 games. But I don't buy into the conspiracy theory stuff. They probably wanted the Phoenix series to go 7 as well.
Triple7 wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:Triple7 wrote:
Lol tf you guys are talking about. They barely beat the Lakers. They are just in a groove right now. Both times we played, the games went to the last minute, with Tatum shooting poorly. I admit, the Nuggets would be favored, and would be hard to beat, but we just need to shoot lights out for 4 games. Its not like the nuggets are that great defensively.
The nuggets are a top 10 defensive team. And when they barely beat LA this season in the playoffs, they shot like 30% from three for the series and Murray was still injured.
The second game the Celtics played against them had Denver shooting like 20% from 3. The first game everyone in Denver shot like crap outside of Murray and Jokic. I remember, I was there.
I don't know if the Celtics don't stand a chance, but I think it's extremely likely that the Timberwolves failing to capitalize on their 2-0 series lead cost the Celtics the championship.
Lol no! Nuggets getting hyped too much. They shot poorly from 3, because they are not a good 3pts shooting team, and they don’t shoot a lot. Also murray wasn’t injured to start the series, and they were down in the 1st half in games 1 and 2. If the lakers weren’t stupid, they could easily have pushed that series to 7. I still think the nuggets are the team to beat, but they can be beaten.
Wigginstime wrote:Triple7 wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:
The nuggets are a top 10 defensive team. And when they barely beat LA this season in the playoffs, they shot like 30% from three for the series and Murray was still injured.
The second game the Celtics played against them had Denver shooting like 20% from 3. The first game everyone in Denver shot like crap outside of Murray and Jokic. I remember, I was there.
I don't know if the Celtics don't stand a chance, but I think it's extremely likely that the Timberwolves failing to capitalize on their 2-0 series lead cost the Celtics the championship.
Lol no! Nuggets getting hyped too much. They shot poorly from 3, because they are not a good 3pts shooting team, and they don’t shoot a lot. Also murray wasn’t injured to start the series, and they were down in the 1st half in games 1 and 2. If the lakers weren’t stupid, they could easily have pushed that series to 7. I still think the nuggets are the team to beat, but they can be beaten.
This is wrong - Murray injured his calf in game 4 of the Lakers series. The medical staff wanted to hold him out of game 5. One of the reasons the 5 day break between games 2 and 3 of the wolves/nuggets series was so beneficial to Denver was that it gave the Denver medical team time to work with Murray on his calf injury.
CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
thinktank wrote:CodeBreaker wrote:SFour wrote:
they don't....who's going to stop Jokic on their team
Al Horford
Oh please.
Triple7 wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:Triple7 wrote:
Lol tf you guys are talking about. They barely beat the Lakers. They are just in a groove right now. Both times we played, the games went to the last minute, with Tatum shooting poorly. I admit, the Nuggets would be favored, and would be hard to beat, but we just need to shoot lights out for 4 games. Its not like the nuggets are that great defensively.
The nuggets are a top 10 defensive team. And when they barely beat LA this season in the playoffs, they shot like 30% from three for the series and Murray was still injured.
The second game the Celtics played against them had Denver shooting like 20% from 3. The first game everyone in Denver shot like crap outside of Murray and Jokic. I remember, I was there.
I don't know if the Celtics don't stand a chance, but I think it's extremely likely that the Timberwolves failing to capitalize on their 2-0 series lead cost the Celtics the championship.
Lol no! Nuggets getting hyped too much. They shot poorly from 3, because they are not a good 3pts shooting team, and they don’t shoot a lot. Also murray wasn’t injured to start the series, and they were down in the 1st half in games 1 and 2. If the lakers weren’t stupid, they could easily have pushed that series to 7. I still think the nuggets are the team to beat, but they can be beaten.
Triple7 wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:Triple7 wrote:
Lol tf you guys are talking about. They barely beat the Lakers. They are just in a groove right now. Both times we played, the games went to the last minute, with Tatum shooting poorly. I admit, the Nuggets would be favored, and would be hard to beat, but we just need to shoot lights out for 4 games. Its not like the nuggets are that great defensively.
The nuggets are a top 10 defensive team. And when they barely beat LA this season in the playoffs, they shot like 30% from three for the series and Murray was still injured.
The second game the Celtics played against them had Denver shooting like 20% from 3. The first game everyone in Denver shot like crap outside of Murray and Jokic. I remember, I was there.
I don't know if the Celtics don't stand a chance, but I think it's extremely likely that the Timberwolves failing to capitalize on their 2-0 series lead cost the Celtics the championship.
Lol no! Nuggets getting hyped too much. They shot poorly from 3, because they are not a good 3pts shooting team, and they don’t shoot a lot. Also murray wasn’t injured to start the series, and they were down in the 1st half in games 1 and 2. If the lakers weren’t stupid, they could easily have pushed that series to 7. I still think the nuggets are the team to beat, but they can be beaten.
Ambrose wrote:CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
Minnesota has been doing this a ton each of the last three games.
CoP wrote:Ambrose wrote:CoP wrote:Wolves were able to limit Jokic the best when it wasn't Gobert on him. Gobert is DPOY for his free-range rim protection, not for his ability to defend in space. Wolves have to figure out a way to have KAT defend Jokic more often rather than him just standing in the weakside corner.
They also need to force Jokic to defend on more possessions, in the hope that it might tire him out and maybe get him a little frustrated if he gets into foul trouble.
All that said, there's no guarantee any of that will work. You just do what might work best against the best player in the league.
Minnesota has been doing this a ton each of the last three games.
OK, but it hasn't been enough. The last two games, Jokic has been matched up on defense with Gobert for 44 minutes and then 41 minutes. That's way too much against a limited offensive player.
The Wolves need to do more to get him matched up against Ant. Or if it's going to be a big, then maybe Reid, because Reid will be the most physical with him. Heck, even KAT will post him up and make him work more than Gobert, who is primarily a screen and roll guy but in the playoffs is just primarily a screener.