DCZards wrote:Dat2U wrote:Todd reminds me of an MPJ lite. Natural looking stroke and good athleticism at 6-9 but the lack of awareness, recognition on both sides of the ball screams project. Can get lost in the speed of the game. That's concerning. Definitely needs extended run in the D-league. Not a terrible pick at 31 but they could have done alot better IMO.
I agree with you on Todd’s shortcomings. But those are the kind of things that can improve with age, experience and coaching. What can’t be taught is the size, length, athleticism and sweet shooting stroke that Todd brings with him.
After playing it safe with the 22 year-old Kispert I think it was a smart move to swing for the fences with the 19 year-old Todd.
It's not a matter of whether Todd can do this, that or the other thing. & it's not a matter of swinging for the fences vs. playing it safe. Above all, it's not a matter of "Todd or no one."
Did we extract the most potential value out of the available prospects by picking Todd at 31? That is the question. Or, could we have done better by trading down with that pick? Likely gotten both Todd & another prospect of equal value (or maybe of higher value)?
If that seems likely -- & it certainly does to me -- then it was non-optimal to pick Todd. Period.
"But," a person might reply, "if we'd traded down we might have missed on Todd!"
To which the answer is, "So what?"
That was one hell of a R2. & it sure wasn't about "Todd or bust." Again, we see Tommy's most straightforward weakness: he tends to go "all in" on guys. That's how we got Rui at #9, certainly no bargain however he turns out.
Still, in all, between trading Russ & at least getting 2 guys out of the draft, Tommy has had a good couple of days.
edit: returning to my question -- "Did we extract the most potential value out of the available prospects by picking Todd at 31? That is the question. Or, could we have done better by trading down with that pick? Likely gotten both Todd & another prospect of equal value (or maybe of higher value)?"
Looking back, the answer is obvious. We'd have been better off trading down. Moreover, the exact trade is also obvious: immediately after we picked Todd at #31 the Knicks traded the #32 pick to the Thunder for picks #34 & #36. Obviously, they'd have been even happier to have the #31 pick for 34 & 36.
With 34 & 36, the Knicks picked Rokas Jokubaitas & Miles McBride. Presumably, we'd have been able to take Todd & McBride. That's better than just Todd.
Of course, Todd might have gone #32 or #33 -- in that case, we'd have been able to take Herb Jones & Miles McBride.
For that matter, just review the list of guys taken from 34 on down & tell me with a straight face that there aren't two guys there you'd rather have than just Isaiah Todd!