ForeverTFC wrote:Scase wrote:Mikistan wrote:Are you seriously positing this hasn't happened since the chip?
As stupid as the FVV scenario was, it wasn't "intentional" so much as it was gross mismanagement. He doesnt let players walk for nothing as the default option, he gets caught up in stupidity and playing chicken/evaluating. Unless I'm forgetting some other instances? in my defence I have the memory of a 90 year old, so it's possible
Ibaka? Gasol? Biyombo?
If you're going to speak so matter of fact about everything yet continuously get things wrong, maybe post a bit less and read a little bit more? Every post in every thread is the same at this point.
Ibaka and Gasol were let go to have a chance at Giannis, I literally said "doesnt let players walk for nothing". As in no reason, not just literally no return. I disagree with him handling them that way, but he didn't do it for **** and giggles.
And seriously, Biyombo lol? He let go a guy who put up 5/8/0 and you think that was him letting a player go for nothing? He declined an option on a player that had virtually zero value.
Also since you're such of fan of saying how I should read a little bit more. Maybe take a page out of your own book.
How can I have spoken so "matter of fact", yet also say "Unless I'm forgetting some other instances?". That is the antithesis to saying something with the conviction that you seem to have injected due to your own emotions. It's called leaving room for doubt, since I pretty clearly said I'm not 100% confident. I woiuldn't think I'd have to explain such basic concepts to an adult.
Duffman100 wrote:Kawhi? Danny Green??
Wait, are you being serious? Kawhi, the guy who had zero intention of coming back, and was widely known to be heading to LA? That Kawhi? The Kawhi that not a GM in the league with half a brain cell would trade for because of that exact fact?
Or Danny, who explicitly stated he wouldn't come back without Kawhi?
Dude, unless this was sarcasm, put some effort into your post.