Juan Dixon traded for Primoz Brezec (pg 24)

Post #121 » by **The Duke** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

lol ... after 5mins of loading this page ... theres still nuting to say

d.sil · Post #122 » by **d.sil** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

DonkeyPunch wrote:THIS BETTER be true or im going after your offspring and my descendants will hunt down your bloodline for all eternity.

go to raps TV right now. you will see him on.
this isnt a lie.

Boogie! · Post #123 » by **Boogie!** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

Griff83 wrote:ill say Dixon and Graham for Pietrus

if graham was involved he would've been mentioned. look like graham's stuck on our bench for the rest of the season.

Bankai · Post #124 » by **Bankai** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

Juan is the one with bigger salary it seems in this deal. Plus yes im watching BC talking right now on Raps TV, Dixon HAS already been traded, just need the final word from the other GM to make it official, then he can announce who is coming to Toronto.

Post #125 » by **theSkinny** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

welcome new raptor...whomever you are

bringbackhoffa · Post #126 » by **bringbackhoffa** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

maybe its devean george and there wainting for him to waive his no trade clause

_MidNight_ · Post #127 » by **_MidNight_** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

Griff83 wrote:ill say Dixon and Graham for Pietrus

It's just Juan and it's for a player and cash consideration...

dagger · Post #128 » by **dagger** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:20 pm

ruckus wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Thats what I was thinking.

Maybe, maybe not. If we're taking back a few more dollars for this season to help a team out on luxury tax, then the cash is not equalization for talent, but for our budget.

That said, if the player is a complete stiff, it won't bother me. Sometimes you can do a couple of favors with a trade like this. You make Juan's agent happy, and you make another GM feel good. It's all about accumulating the most poker chips.

Brinbe · Post #129 » by **Brinbe** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:21 pm

BC is a master of saying a lot, but saying nothing. Damn.

Post #130 » by **Double Helix** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:21 pm

Good for Juan but if we gave up Juan AND got cash considerations in return than this other player can't be too great. Probably just practice fodder. I'm predicting some scrubby big man or PG.

Huskies1947 · Post #131 » by **Huskies1947** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:21 pm

Lanny-Barbie wrote:The leafs situation right now is more intriguing then anything going on in sports in Toronto. Calm the f^& down.

What's so intriguing? They are going to suck for a few more years, they will NOT hire someone like Bryan Colangelo, and leafs fans will be acting like the Stanley Cup is the holy grail of sports.

Giant_ · Post #132 » by **Giant_** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:21 pm

Shak23 wrote:My friend at the ACC just bumped into Gheradini and mentioned Juan Dixon, future 2nd rd pick and cash for Pietrus.

He just called me to relay the info.

Be glad that PM's have been disabled...

bakafool · Post #133 » by **bakafool** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:21 pm

Brinbe wrote:BC is a master of saying a lot, but saying nothing. Damn.

True. He'd make a great politician.

Consequence · Post #134 » by **Consequence** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

Maybe the other player couldn't be contacted yet, and they'd rather have his old team let him know than have the media break it.

junkbond_trader · Post #135 » by **junkbond_trader** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

N1QUE24 wrote:Juan Dixon has been traded to Liverpool for Steven Gerrard.

are you tom hicks?

needbox · Post #136 » by **needbox** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

Martin time to suit-up

Stromile12 · Post #137 » by **Stromile12** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

Juan for scot pollard

Consequence · Post #138 » by **Consequence** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

Double post.

KB24VC15 · Post #139 » by **KB24VC15** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:22 pm

man i jus heard the deal, nothing big

Graham for Lebron James
Dixon for Bryant
Rasho for Gasol

nothing worth getting excited about

dagger · Post #140 » by **dagger** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:23 pm

Giant_ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

If this turns out to be wrong (which it likely is), then be glad that PM's have been disabled...

That doesn't work salarywise.