Jarrett Allen and Caris LeVert for Brandon Ingram
Pelicans rebalance their roster nicely and improve defensively
Cavaliers fill in nicely at wing with one of the better realistic options
Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,042
- And1: 2,702
- Joined: Aug 09, 2017
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 17,147
- And1: 5,729
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
is Cleveland trading Garland for a big after this?
IMO you don’t break up Allen/Mobley since the guard change should be enough to balance.. But if I am, I definitely still need a starting big back. even if you want a PF..
I think NOP is owed value, I just wouldn’t add it from Cleveland’s side..
IMO you don’t break up Allen/Mobley since the guard change should be enough to balance.. But if I am, I definitely still need a starting big back. even if you want a PF..
I think NOP is owed value, I just wouldn’t add it from Cleveland’s side..
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,042
- And1: 2,702
- Joined: Aug 09, 2017
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
Looks like an equal trade so far
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,633
- And1: 2,665
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
Re: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
NYG wrote:Looks like an equal trade so far
I don’t think an unprotected 1st is the right value add by Pels.
Allen + LeVert
FOR
Ingram + Hawkins
Seems right.
And really Pels would ask for Garland too, if Cavs say no (or Mitchell is guard leaving) Pels would ask for a 3rd team - like Murray from Hawks - to leverage salary out (and LeVert expiring).
LeVert + Daniels + Picks for Murray + Griffin.
Allen
Zion
Murphy | Herb
McCollum
Murray
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,918
- And1: 939
- Joined: May 19, 2023
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
I don't understand the idea that Ingram has very positive value at all.
He needs to
1. Be willing and able to defer
2. Stay healthy
3. Start defending
4. Start shooting threes
And he hasn't shown this in, what, 8 years in the NBA?
He needs to
1. Be willing and able to defer
2. Stay healthy
3. Start defending
4. Start shooting threes
And he hasn't shown this in, what, 8 years in the NBA?
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 54,417
- And1: 32,745
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
To start with, the next unprotected pick the Cavs can trade is 2031, which Altman isn't going to be permitted to trade.
But again, the biggest issue is whether Ingram will agree to a reasonable extension, which is something neither the Cavs nor Pelicans have any control over, and if he won't, the Cavs should just bail out altogether.
But again, the biggest issue is whether Ingram will agree to a reasonable extension, which is something neither the Cavs nor Pelicans have any control over, and if he won't, the Cavs should just bail out altogether.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,183
- And1: 376
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
21, Ingram, Daniels, Hawkins, Nance, 2025 lal first
For
Garland and Allen
Both balance.
For
Garland and Allen
Both balance.
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 54,417
- And1: 32,745
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Allen/LeVert for Ingram: Which Team Needs To Add A Future Unprotected 1st
Xman wrote:21, Ingram, Daniels, Hawkins, Nance
For
Garland and Allen
Both balance.
The Cavs aren't going to do that and the Pels have to move off CJ in order to trade for Garland.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions