wemby wrote:Ball4life32 wrote:wemby wrote:Spurs are a team full of rookies, coming off an experimenting / tanking season where they even tried to pass a PF as a PG, and had Wemby chucking up 1 legged long threes half the season.
Hawks have been in the same place for 3 years, injuries or no injuries, Trae or no Trae. They are who they are (play in team), unless they make serious changes. Sarr in this draft changes nothing, but maybe if you move that pick for a good 3&D + package Trae/Dejounte for better fitting pieces that could make a real difference.
Hawks have 4 top 8 offenses in a row with Trae and have gotten better offensively every year since their CF run yet their record has gotten worse. All because of defense….when Trae went down 7th ranked offense 29th ranked defense. (At this point hawks were the only below .500 team with a top 16 offense) If Sarr is as good defensively as they say (not saying he is or isn’t) than that 100% can change the hawks trajectory. Last time hawks even had medicore defense is when they made their run. Hawks getting better defensively is how they improve.
Sarr would be a rookie and is a non shooter and a bad rebounder, who plays the same position where you already have 2 good players in Capela and Okongwu. If you were to tell me the Hawks' big plan for improving in '24 is drafting Sarr and playing him ahead of Capela/Okongwu, I'd be ECSTATIC as a Spurs fan in anticipation for another lottery pick. Only reason to worry is if the Hawks package the pick for good veteran help, say no. 1 for Herb Jones plus spare parts or something like that.
Sarr is not a non shooter and he’s a better offensive rebounder at this point. Capela is most likely gone and had negative net rating with Trae, Murray, Johnson. Could be addition by subtraction. Hes 30 yr old expiring too….not the same player he used to be. I like Herb but not a shot I trade #1 for him.