Game Thread: New York [14-28] @ Golden State [26-18] Sun 6PM

crzy · Post #241 » by **crzy** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:59 am

Mylie10 wrote:FT's almost cost us again.

Beans puts it in the face of those who said he has no lift and should be gobbling up more rebounds.

How funny!

He gets slammed by killcalliwhatever and then goes for 26 boards.

Somtimes I think they read this ess we throw out there.

He didn't need any lift to get boards over Curry and Zbo :rofl:

Mylie10 · Post #242 » by **Mylie10** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:03 am

Cuddos to Al's D on Zach. He shut him down pretty good compared to the midgets guarding him in the first half.

Go figure the sarting five is our best five.

I wish Nellie would play guys at their normal positions, we might actually go on more good runs.

Of course for Houston that's out the window with Al fronting Yao.

Sid the Squid · Post #243 » by **Sid the Squid** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:05 am

Our bench combined for a -45 +/- tonight...Good thing we didnt use our draft picks.

zero · Post #244 » by **zero** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:19 am

mistatwo mayn wrote:These guys remind me of cramming for a class; nonchalant for the first 8 weeks and then BAM, they whip out their books just right before the midterm.

HECK YEAH!?!???

Twinkie defense · Post #245 » by **Twinkie defense** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:35 am

ajbry wrote:Maybe I'm seeing things but I think AB has a cold sore.

His sponsor is Valtrex.

Mylie10 · Post #246 » by **Mylie10** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:42 am

ajbry wrote:Maybe I'm seeing things but I think AB has a cold sore.

His brothers in town and they've been busy

seattleknick · Post #247 » by **seattleknick** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:47 am

Just a curious question for Warriors fans? How do you think an explosive guard like Nate Robinson would do on your roster. Granted he played a little out of control tonight, he usually plays a lot more in control. I just think his tempo is one of a kind and really could create open shots all over the court on a good running team. And please don't post the "I don't want a midget on my team" type comment. I'm interested in a serious opinion. thanx.

Mylie10 · Post #248 » by **Mylie10** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:50 am

He's to out of control for me.

Nice energy, but a smal bull in the China shop.

I like Crawford now. Didn't used to but now he plays a much better game.

When the knicks stopped going to him I knew we would win.

Twinkie defense · Post #249 » by **Twinkie defense** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:01 am

I like Nate. In fact when I heard Phoenix drafted him, I thought oh man, they could use a guy like Nate right now.

MbengaforMVP · Post #250 » by **MbengaforMVP** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:06 am

seattleknick wrote:Just a curious question for Warriors fans? How do you think an explosive guard like Nate Robinson would do on your roster. Granted he played a little out of control tonight, he usually plays a lot more in control. I just think his tempo is one of a kind and really could create open shots all over the court on a good running team. And please don't post the "I don't want a midget on my team" type comment. I'm interested in a serious opinion. thanx.

We have no problem with short guards...after all, we gave Earl Boykins his big break. And I think Robinson would fit in well with the Warriors, and we could probably use Lee too. Hey, I don't suppose the Knicks would be interested in trading for Pietrus? :crazy:

Jose7 · Post #251 » by **Jose7** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:34 am

question: how important is stephen jackson to your team?

old rem · Post #252 » by **old rem** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:35 am

seattleknick wrote:Just a curious question for Warriors fans? How do you think an explosive guard like Nate Robinson would do on your roster. Granted he played a little out of control tonight, he usually plays a lot more in control. I just think his tempo is one of a kind and really could create open shots all over the court on a good running team. And please don't post the "I don't want a midget on my team" type comment. I'm interested in a serious opinion. thanx.

I kind of like Little Nate. He's no quitter and while a runt-plays bigger. He's a bit redundant for the Warriors. We have a skinny 6-3 SG who's pretty deluxe. However-we DO use speed as a tactical edge,and Nate has a speed game. I suspect he could be more use than most folks think-but then again-he'd have a rather minor role and I don't know what sort of deal might result in him being here. Maybe he could be the secondary guy in a deal aimed mostly at D Lee.

Twinkie defense · Post #253 » by **Twinkie defense** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:42 am

[quote="Jose7

old rem · Post #254 » by **old rem** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:45 am

[quote="Jose7

Mylie10 · Post #255 » by **Mylie10** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:57 am

[quote="Jose7

CupcakeNoFillin · Post #256 » by **CupcakeNoFillin** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:21 am

[quote="Jose7

old rem · Post #257 » by **old rem** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:21 am

turk3d wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

He was hurt. It wasn't since the last couple of games that he's gotten healthy. That + 41 minutes (probably the most minutes Nellie's ever played him). Forget trying to hold his salary back next year. Who still wants to trade him?

Biedrins should be regarded as the untouchable when it comes to trades. Sure..there is th3e outside chance the W's bungle contract negotiations terribly and somehow we lose the guy....but if that was to happen---heads must roll and we must gear up for a few more years of lotto instead of playoffs.

Beans got unleashed and rebounded like Nate Thurmond. Not bad for a guy who's 5 years away from his peak.

Twinkie defense · Post #258 » by **Twinkie defense** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:38 am

jrhester wrote:I don't think the ball ever hit the ground on that break.

Just watched that again... sweet: Beidrins rebounds, to Jackson, to Ellis, to Baron for the finish, ball never hit the ground, coast to coast.

Post #259 » by **floppymoose** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:33 am

Beans is indeed the man, but I'm not excited that the only big on a run and gun team got 26 boards against the Knicks.

Sid the Squid · Post #260 » by **Sid the Squid** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:52 pm

floppymoose wrote:Beans is indeed the man,

too bad your man Nellie doesnt think like you

Minutes cut back coming soon.