Nelson interview From Khoeekami's blog

warriortone · Post #21 » by **warriortone** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:41 pm

Monta Ellis on the backdoor cut, fed by Webber...FTW.

Twinkie defense · Post #22 » by **Twinkie defense** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:52 pm

Barnes is a pretty good passer.

azwfan · Post #23 » by **azwfan** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:20 am

If webber can rebound we might even be faster with him. Imagine, not getting killed on the offensive boards... then we might actually be able to get out of 4th gear and kick it into 5th.

Post #24 » by **Sleepy51** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:29 am

jrhester wrote:Barnes is a pretty good passer.

Isn't he our 4th best passer?

Baron
Jack
Monta
Barnes

CJ
Al
Beans

All the young bigs

Bukie
Pete

Maybe that's why Nellie wants another passer so bad?

Sid the Squid · Post #25 » by **Sid the Squid** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 am

POB would be at least #3 with a few thousand minutes of PT under his belt

Mylie10 · Post #26 » by **Mylie10** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:50 am

What about the crazy idea of more Barnes at the 3?

We could see more Barnes backing SJax and playing SF. Which if we have some lineups of Beans, Web, and Barnes, that should help the rebounding.

Or Web, Al, Barnes gives you a little more rebounding.

It does make us a little more versatile.

Za_Warrior · Post #27 » by **Za_Warrior** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:05 am

If Nellie wants Web in for boards and passing I can foresee a possible lineup rotation of :
Beans, Al / Buike, Webber, Monta & BD.
I still see Jax starting, but he might get some rest now if Nellie is happy with Webber being a major ball handler on the court.

I'm so excited and just pray that Webber is playing for us against the Hornets

Mylie10 · Post #28 » by **Mylie10** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:16 am

Khoeekami's on with Raplh and Tom right now. He's stupid.

He doesn't understand Don Nelson. how'd he get his job?

He's consistantly wrong.

What a putz!

-bob- · Post #29 » by **-bob-** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:30 am

Tim K needs to do something about that chin.

Post #30 » by **FNQ** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:25 am

Mylie10 wrote:Reggae you're mixing Wright and O'Bryant with Pietrus and Barnes.

Nellie's only willing to play Pietrus and Barnes, but he think's Webber would be better. I agree that Webber is a better option than Pietrus and Barnes at the power positions.

But if you're argument is Wright and O'Bryant instead of Pietrus, Barnes, or Webber then I have to agree with you.

But Nellie won't play Wright and Obee so they don't count in this situation.

It only counts who Nellie will actually play.

Webber > Barnes/Pietrus PF/C

Absolutely... we got marginally better, and I actually am excited about Webber coming back. It will be interesting to see what he does. That's from a fan perspective.

From a basketball perspective, I'm withholding judgement until after the trade deadline. If Wright doesnt see 10 mpg going into March/April, this move had no point but to cause a stir and show Mulson/Cohan's great magician's abilities of distracting the masses from the real issues.

BTW... I am a fan of your radical Barnes at the 3 theories.. it's a little out there but I think it just might get results :nod:

Mylie10 · Post #31 » by **Mylie10** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:07 am

510Reggae wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

BTW... I am a fan of your radical Barnes at the 3 theories.. it's a little out there but I think it just might get results