Re-drafting 2006
Moderator: bwgood77
-
NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,072
- And1: 18,199
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Marques Colston= best reciever in this draft.
O btw I don't think the Jets would take Mcneil over Brick.
Mcneil was great this year, but Brick could be THE best pass blocker in the league(LT pass blocking is like top 3 in importance to teams)
O btw I don't think the Jets would take Mcneil over Brick.
Mcneil was great this year, but Brick could be THE best pass blocker in the league(LT pass blocking is like top 3 in importance to teams)
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
UTMCretin
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 5,087
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 05, 2006
- Location: Look happy, it's the end of the world
MHizzle wrote:The Broncos traded up during the draft specifically to get a QB, so I don't know why they're still picking at 11.
Am I the only one that has issue with taking Young first overall?
But.. but.. he wins games... Sure, he does it with a QB rating that Michael Vick would be crucified over and would even lower Kyle Boller's standards a tad, with more INT's than TD's, but you can't argue with near .500 success. Plus, with the Texans O-line, those legs of his would really come in handy.
-
RockyBalboa
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,539
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 02, 2004
-
BiggMann
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,832
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 13, 2003
- Location: Energy Solutions Arena
It's that time of year when sports writers with no inside info pull out their laptops and jot down rubbish.
not only was that revised draft ridiculous, but the picks that were made make no sense.
I mean, Mario Wiliams dropping that low is perposterous.... Colston in top ten is sickening. He's a solid WR, but no where near a top ten pick
not only was that revised draft ridiculous, but the picks that were made make no sense.
I mean, Mario Wiliams dropping that low is perposterous.... Colston in top ten is sickening. He's a solid WR, but no where near a top ten pick
Bye Bye Sloan, Good Riddance Deron. Hello new Era in Jazz Basketball.
-
Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Ah yes, the knee-jerk assessment of a draft just one year later. Helping hack writers collect a paycheck since 1970.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,072
- And1: 18,199
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
BiggMann wrote:It's that time of year when sports writers with no inside info pull out their laptops and jot down rubbish.
not only was that revised draft ridiculous, but the picks that were made make no sense.
I mean, Mario Wiliams dropping that low is perposterous.... Colston in top ten is sickening. He's a solid WR, but no where near a top ten pick
Why is that so bad?
You do realize the pace he was on before his injury?
The only rookie receivers I remember playing better are Moss and Boldin.
It is even funnier, because the receivers in this draft blew, so I can definitely see him going top 10.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
MHZ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,571
- And1: 531
- Joined: Mar 05, 2003
- Location: Denver, CO
-
One. Count them, one of the eight guys didn't take Vince Young #1 overall. Quotes like "slam dunk" and "no-brainer" are used to describe picking VY #1 if you're Houston. Is this more for the PR move of keeping him at home, or is it because he's honestly head and shoulders above the rest of the field?
Return to The General NFL Board