jbk1234 wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I'm saying it doesn't matter if you had the dream team, the Monstars, or me and the golden girls. Schematically it wasn't personnel that was lacking, the scheme itself is still flawed.jbk1234 wrote:
I mean who would execute that scheme? CPJ in his second NBA game? Mitchell is a great SG, but he's a SG. Multiple players missing multiple open 3s is hard to offset.
The most impressive quarter by any Cavs player in the playoffs, to me anyway, was the third quarter in the 4th game when Garland figured out exactly how far M. Robinson was willing to come out of drop coverage and just yo-yo'd him. It scared Thibs enough to bring McBride off the bench and play 3 on 5 offensively. That's where JBB needs a counter ready, but we weren't anywhere near there tonight.
The guys are still in poor rebounding position due to heavy shot contests, Mitchell was still getting trapped at half court without any idea where to place the ball, and the Knicks were still off and running in space. If that is the game plan, it sucks and it got us bounced in 5 games.
Maybe he's playing coy and trying to save something for tonight or even the playoffs but I have never viewed JB as a very tactful guy. Thibs will easily be able to win 4 of 7 times again, with JB's lack of adjustments after 6 months.
Scheme can be personnel dependent. Things are going to look different with Mitchell as the primary ball handler and Strus as the secondary ball handler, or CPJ as the primary ball handler for the second unit. Having a single 7 foot rim protector is very different than having two on the floor.
It's kind of the chicken and the egg thing, while you should scheme to your personnel, you should also have a team identity to which players fit in.
Regardless this team isn't winning many games with Mitchell as the primary ball handler. He's just not a guy who can run your offense effectively.